Recent

30 March 25

I am a rehabilitation physician that works at a public hospital that offers rehab in the home and hospital in the home for patients, as part of early discharge or hospital substitution strategies. If a patient chooses to use their private health insurance while in a public hospital for the purposes of a joint replacement and is then discharged home for rehab in the home as part of the hospital the hospital substitution scheme – Can I charge the insurer a gap payment for my home visit to them and what item number should I charge a 116 (in hospital follow up) or a 128 (follow as part of a home visit)?

24 March 25

On an internal referral written by a Specialist/ Physician does the patients GP details have to be written as per the Health Insurance Regs Section 99. As it is an internal referral the patient is already being treated in the same facility and would have already named their GP and have their GP recorded on their file.

17 March 25

If an on-call obstetrician attends a delivery on behalf of the primary obstetrician (perhaps because they are unavailable at that time), should the on-call obstetrician bill with Medicare and then pass this income on (less an agreed service/locum fee) to the primary obstetrician or should this be the other way round? Existing item numbers only seem to cover services that extend beyond the delivery (i.e. delivery plus at least 5 days of post natal care, etc). I am asking in the context of the on-call obstetrician only being involved in the delivery and not any of the pre-natal or post-natal care. I need to establish billing practices for this exact scenario.

17 March 25

Can you please weigh in on the following question? I sent this to askMBS and got something of an unhelpful answer. — Dear Medicare Support Team,I am writing to seek formal clarification regarding the applicability of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Items 110 (initial attendance by a consultant physician) and 116 (subsequent attendance by a consultant physician) when multiple attendances occur on the same day for what appears to be a single clinical problem. ContextAccording to MBS Note AN.0.7, payment may be made for multiple attendances on the same day provided the subsequent attendances are not a continuation of the initial or earlier attendances. The guidance includes examples such as an eye examination followed by instillation of mydriatics, with a later refraction considered part of the same attendance. However, the examples in AN.0.7 typically describe scenarios where no new assessment or additional clinical decision-making is required.I am seeking confirmation on whether a different interpretation might apply in cases where a clear, distinct clinical decision needs to be made at a later time—thus constituting, in essence, a separate attendance. Example ScenarioInitial Attendance (MBS Item 110)A paediatrician assesses a child presenting with moderate asthma at 10:00 a.m. The assessment involves taking a history, performing an examination, and deciding on an initial treatment plan (e.g., bronchodilators, supportive measures).Subsequent Attendance (Potential MBS Item 116)Several hours later (e.g., 2:00 p.m.), the child is reviewed again. This visit requires reassessment of...

10 March 25

Monthly round up There have been no updates from the PSR since we last reported, but plenty of FWA activity around the world. FWA around the world New York doctor facing jail following conviction for $24 million Medicare fraud scheme Dr Alexander Baldonado, aged 69, was found guilty by a jury for causing over $24 million fraudulent claims to Medicare which were not medically necessary. The Australian equivalent would be that the services were not “clinically relevant” which is our legal threshold standard. Like the U.S standard, our “clinical relevance” standard also means that all services must be necessary for the treatment of the patient. Our standard therefore operates very similarly to the U.S standard. Dr Baldonado authorised hundreds of unnecessary tests for Medicare patients who attended COVID-19 testing events, but he was not treating any of them and, in many cases, he did not speak to or examine the patients prior to ordering the tests. He also billed Medicare for fictitious consultations and received illegal cash kickbacks and bribes from the owner of a medical equipment company in exchange for ordering medically unnecessary orthotic braces. Dr Baldonado has been remanded in custody and will be sentenced in June 2025. You can read the Department of Justice report here. Louisiana doctor sentenced to 87 months jail for $5.4 million healthcare fraud scheme Dr Adrian Dexter Talbot, aged 59, owned and operated clinics that accepted cash payments for patients seeking controlled substances, such as opioids. He was found to have pre-signed prescriptions for patients he did not see or examine. With...

10 March 25

I am hoping for some clarification around using the item number 55848 for ultrasound. Rehabilitation medicine physicians require ultrasound guidance for botulinum toxin injections. Assuming the ultrasound machine is appropriately accredited, are we allowed to bill this code for the use of the ultrasound machine in addition to the item numbers for the injections (18360)?

3 March 25

If Doctor A writes a named referral to Doctor B from Doctor A’s private rooms to a public hospital outpatient clinic and through the triage process Doctor A is assigned the patient to treat in the public hospital outpatient clinic can MBS be claimed? Would the referral from the private rooms be able to be utilised in billing as the referring Doctor and treating Doctor are the same but have different provider numbers.

24 February 25

As an anaesthetist who is not rostered in the intensive care unit (ICU), I am sometimes asked to go to ICU and take a ventilated and sedated patient to radiology for various imaging procedures such as CT scans and MRIs. Can I bill a pre-anaesthetic consultation when I go and see the patient? I don’t talk to them obviously. The initiation item I bill is 21922.

10 February 25

If 92210 is the telehealth equivalent of item 599, does this mean the doctor would also have to visit the patient, or open the consulting rooms? I am very confused by this. I asked AskMBS and their answer left me with more questions. Here is the answer I received. “Generally, MBS telehealth (video) and phone items have the same requirements as their face-to-face counterpart items. However, in relation to item 599 and 92210, the advice in explanatory note AN.0.19–i.e. ‘If the attendance is undertaken at consulting rooms, it is necessary for the practitioner to return to and specially open the consulting rooms for the attendance’ (and the advice in note AN.0.19 generally)–applies to face-to-face services only. Where the service is provided via telehealth, this requirement does not apply.”

How to navigate your Medicare statement and more informative free resources
CPD Courses
How to navigate your Medicare statement and more informative free resources
Medicare Billing Course
CPD Courses
Medicare Billing Course
MBS Answers Subscription
Ethical medical billing and the Medicare Benefits Schedule
MBS AnswersAustralia

1 Year subscription includes unlimited access to all answers and ability to ask questions.

MBS Answers Subscription
MBS AnswersAustralia
$299 1 year
How does MBS Answers work?
FreeMBS Answers

How does MBS Answers work?

How does MBS Answers work?
FreeMBS Answers
FREE 5 min